Right-wing is Right

Beef  and the Environment ·         Giving up beef will reduce carbon footprint more than cars, says expert from  University of Oxford.  ·         “The US and Europe alike are using so much of their land in highly inefficient livestock farming systems, while so much good quality cropland is being used to grow animal feeds rather than human food. ” ·         Study shows red meat dwarfs others for environmental impact, using 28 times more land and 11 times water for pork or chicken. ·         Beef production results in five times more climate-warming emissions than chicken or pork.   Beef’s environmental impact dwarfs that of other meat including chicken and pork, new research reveals, with one expert saying that eating less red meat would be a better way for people to cut carbon emissions than giving up their cars. The heavy impact on the environment of meat production was known but the research shows a new scale and scope of damage, particularly for beef. The popular

Meat and the Environment    Raising animals for food requires massive amounts of land, food, energy, and water and causes immense animal suffering. Climate Change A staggering 51 percent or more of global greenhouse-gas emissions are caused by animal agriculture, according to a report published by the Worldwatch Institute. According to the United Nations, a global shift toward a vegan diet is necessary to combat the worst effects of  climate change . Water Use It takes an enormous amount of water to grow crops for animals to eat, clean filthy factory farms, and give animals water to drink. A single cow used for milk can drink up to 50 gallons of water per day—or twice that amount in hot weather—and it takes 683 gallons of water to produce just 1 gallon of milk. It takes more than 2,400 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, while producing 1 pound of tofu only requires 244 gallons of water. By going vegan, one person can save approximately 219,000 gallons of wat